Seven months after our first look at the crypto market structure bill, XRP has swung from a January high near $2.41 down to under $1 and back above $1.40. Here’s what’s actually changed on the regulatory front and what’s still genuinely uncertain.
Seven months after our first look at the crypto market structure bill, XRP has swung from a January high near $2.41 down to under $1 and back above $1.40. Here’s what’s actually changed on the regulatory front and what’s still genuinely uncertain.
XRP is trading in the $1.40s as of late August 2026, having clawed back from a cycle low near $0.99 hit on August 17 in one of its sharpest weekly moves of the year — up roughly 40-48% in about a week. The bigger story, though, is regulatory. The CLARITY Act, the market structure bill we covered back in January, still has not passed the full Senate. It cleared the House in 2025 and the Senate Banking Committee in May 2026, but a floor vote didn’t happen before the August recess. Separately, the SEC and CFTC issued a binding joint interpretation in March 2026 naming XRP one of 16 “digital commodities” — a real regulatory win, but one that a future administration could still unwind without a law behind it.
That gap between administrative guidance and actual legislation is the thread running through everything below. XRP holders got real clarity this year. They just didn’t get all of it, and the piece that’s missing is arguably the piece that matters most.
Let’s start with the price, because the last eight months have not been a straight line. XRP opened 2026 near its cycle peak of $2.41, then spent the spring and summer grinding lower. By August 1 it was sitting around $1.06, down roughly 43% for the year. It kept sliding into mid-August, bottoming at $0.9877 on August 17 — a level that briefly put the token’s psychologically important $1 floor in question.
Then came the reversal. Bitcoin posted its biggest weekly gain in two years, briefly topping $79,000, and altcoins followed. XRP crossed $1.40 for the first time in months and spiked as high as $1.66 intraday before sellers stepped back in, with leveraged longs getting flushed on the pullback. By August 25, XRP was changing hands around $1.44-$1.48, up roughly 48% from the August 17 low. Resistance sits at $1.50, then a heavier band at $1.65-$1.70, with $1.83 — untested since January — above that. Support on a pullback is generally seen around $1.20.
What actually drove the bounce? Two things, according to traders and analysts covering the move: President Trump held a crypto policy summit and publicly pushed Congress to pass the CLARITY Act, and the Treasury announced it would double its long-term bond buyback program from $2 billion to $4 billion — a liquidity move that pushed capital toward riskier assets across the board, not just crypto. Some desks credited the Treasury move directly; others, including MEXC Research, called that connection premature. Either way, this wasn’t an XRP-specific rally. It was a broad, macro-driven move that XRP happened to ride harder than most.
Here’s the honest update on the bill itself, because a lot has happened without much actually resolving. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act passed the House back in July 2025 by a 294-134 vote. The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced its own piece — establishing CFTC authority over digital commodities — on January 29, 2026. The Senate Banking Committee followed with a 15-9 vote in May.
Since then, it’s been stuck. Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed a motion to proceed on August 8, kicking off the cloture process, but the bill didn’t get a floor vote before the chamber left for its August recess. The math is the real obstacle: Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, and cloture needs 60 votes, meaning at least ten Democrats have to cross over. Senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks had signaled openness, but three others — Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen, and Jeff Merkley — formally opposed the merged draft after negotiators stripped out an ethics provision that would have restricted senior officials, including President Trump himself, from backing crypto projects while in office.
That single removed clause tells you a lot about why this keeps stalling. It’s not really a fight about whether XRP is a commodity anymore — most of the industry-versus-regulator argument on that point has quietly moved elsewhere, which we’ll get to. It’s a fight about ethics carve-outs, stablecoin reward provisions, and illicit-finance language that has nothing to do with token classification specifically. Prediction market odds on passage reflect the uncertainty well: confidence sat around 82% back in February and had fallen to roughly 28% by July 30. The Senate returns in September with a three-week window before things get crowded again, and procedural votes could come almost immediately — but “could” is doing a lot of work in that sentence.
While lawmakers argued over ethics clauses, regulators didn’t wait. On March 17, 2026, the SEC and CFTC jointly issued a formal interpretation — not staff guidance, but binding agency action — that sorts crypto assets into five buckets: digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities. Only that last category counts as a security under federal law. XRP landed in the digital commodities bucket alongside Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, and twelve other named tokens.
That’s a meaningful development, and it’s fair to call it a win for the position Ripple argued for years, both in and out of court. It resolves a lot of the ambiguity that hung over exchanges deciding whether to list XRP and over institutions deciding whether to touch it. But there are real limits worth knowing about before anyone treats this as case closed.
This is exactly why the CLARITY Act still matters even after the March ruling. Guidance can change with an election cycle. A law generally can’t, at least not without another act of Congress.
Whatever happens in the Senate, the ETF door already opened, and it opened fast. REX-Osprey’s XRPR launched September 18, 2025, followed by a wave in November: Canary Capital’s XRPC on November 13, Bitwise’s fund a week later, then Grayscale’s GXRP, Franklin Templeton’s XRPZ, and 21Shares’ TOXR all within days of each other. Canary’s launch reportedly drew the highest first-day trading volume of any ETF debut in 2025, across any asset class — not just crypto.
Combined assets crossed $1 billion by mid-December and topped $1.5 billion in cumulative inflows by early March 2026, with roughly 773 million XRP tokens sitting in ETF custody. Goldman Sachs disclosed a $153.8 million position spread across multiple XRP ETF products in its Q4 2025 13F filing — a detail that matters more for what it signals than for the dollar figure itself. When a bank that size is willing to put its name on a 13F line item for a token that spent years fighting the SEC in court, that’s a genuine shift in how the asset is perceived by traditional finance, whatever you think of the price action.
Away from the price chart, Ripple has been busy. The company joined a broader Mastercard push into blockchain-based payments in March 2026 alongside Binance, PayPal, and Circle, and Mastercard extended settlement capabilities to include stablecoins in June. RLUSD, Ripple’s own stablecoin, has been central to that work — including a pilot with Mastercard, WebBank, and Gemini around stablecoin-backed credit card settlement — and RLUSD’s market value recently crossed the $2 billion mark. As of late August, reporting also points to Mastercard extending its relationship with Ripple further, though the specifics of that latest expansion were still emerging as this article was written.
Here’s the part that deserves an honest look rather than a highlight reel, though. More than 300 banks reportedly use RippleNet’s messaging and settlement infrastructure. But bank adoption of RippleNet and actual on-chain XRP usage are two different metrics, and they haven’t moved together. A lot of institutions use RippleNet’s rails without ever touching the token, and where XRP does get used in On-Demand Liquidity corridors, it often converts to the destination currency within seconds — useful as a bridge asset, but not the kind of sustained holding that necessarily supports a higher price on its own. That disconnect isn’t new, and it’s worth keeping in mind before assuming every RippleNet headline translates directly into demand for XRP itself.
Imagine you’ve been holding XRP through every regulatory headline since the original Ripple lawsuit days — the partial summary judgment, the settlement, now the CLARITY Act saga. You’ve probably noticed a pattern: the biggest price moves often happen on hope and momentum, well before anything is actually finalized. That’s exactly what played out in the third week of August, when XRP ripped higher on a presidential speech and a Treasury announcement, not on the CLARITY Act actually passing.
The most common mistake right now is treating regulatory guidance as if it were regulatory law. The March SEC-CFTC interpretation is real and it’s binding on those two agencies today, but it isn’t the kind of permanent statute that survives a change in administration automatically. Buying into the idea that “XRP is now legally a commodity, full stop” skips over the caveats that the regulators themselves built into the ruling.
A second mistake is chasing the rally itself. RSI on XRP moved above 80 during the August surge before cooling to around 60 — a classic overbought signal that historically precedes at least a partial pullback. Buying at $1.60 because the headlines feel good is a very different decision than buying at $1.10 because you’ve done the homework on the regulatory calendar. Neither is guaranteed to work out, but they’re not the same trade.
September is genuinely the pivotal month. The Senate returns with roughly three weeks before the calendar fills up again, and initial procedural votes on the CLARITY Act could happen almost immediately — or the bill could stall again over the same ethics and stablecoin provisions that have blocked it since spring. Watch whether the removed ethics language comes back in some form, since that’s what cost the bill Democratic votes the first time.
Beyond the Senate floor, keep an eye on ETF flow data as a read on institutional sentiment, on whether RLUSD’s stablecoin volume keeps growing independently of XRP’s own price swings, and on Federal Reserve commentary, since the August rally leaned partly on a Treasury liquidity move rather than crypto-specific news. None of these are XRP-specific catalysts in isolation, but together they’ll shape whether the current bounce holds or fades the way earlier 2026 rallies did.
There’s no honest way to answer that with a clean yes or no, and anyone promising certainty about where XRP lands by year-end is skipping past a lot of real unknowns. What’s true is that XRP now sits in a genuinely stronger regulatory position than it did a year ago, backed by a binding federal interpretation, live ETFs holding real assets, and a company that keeps signing payment partnerships. What’s also true is that the single piece of legislation that would lock all of that in has missed its own deadline more than once, and the price has been volatile enough this year to test the patience of anyone who bought near the January high.
This isn’t financial advice, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy or sell XRP or any other asset. Regulatory outcomes in Washington are genuinely unresolved, crypto markets remain volatile by nature, and past price action — including the August rally — says nothing certain about what comes next. Do your own research, size any position to what you can afford to see swing 40% in either direction, and treat every headline, including this one, as one input rather than the whole picture.
No one can forecast this precisely, and anyone claiming otherwise is guessing. As of late August, XRP is trading in the $1.40s after bouncing from a $0.99 low, with resistance around $1.50 and $1.65-$1.70. A Senate vote on the CLARITY Act in September and broader Fed policy will likely matter more to price than any single technical level.
Not yet, as of late August 2026. It passed the House in 2025 and the Senate Banking Committee in May 2026, but it has not cleared a full Senate floor vote. It needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, and negotiations have stalled over ethics and stablecoin provisions. September is the next realistic window for a vote.
In March 2026, the SEC and CFTC jointly issued a binding interpretation classifying XRP as a digital commodity, not a security, along with 15 other tokens. That’s meaningful, but it’s agency guidance rather than a law passed by Congress, and it could be revisited by a future administration.
Yes. Several spot XRP ETFs launched between September and November 2025 from issuers including REX-Osprey, Canary Capital, Bitwise, Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, and 21Shares. Combined inflows topped $1.5 billion by early March 2026, and institutions including Goldman Sachs have disclosed holdings.
That depends entirely on individual risk tolerance and time horizon, and this isn’t financial advice. XRP’s regulatory picture has genuinely improved this year through the SEC/CFTC ruling and live ETFs, but the CLARITY Act remains unpassed and the price has swung more than 50% in both directions within 2026 alone.
RLUSD is Ripple’s own stablecoin, which recently crossed a $2 billion market value milestone and is being used in partnerships with Mastercard for stablecoin-based settlement. It runs alongside XRP rather than replacing it, and its growth reflects Ripple’s broader payments business more than it directly drives XRP’s price.
If you’re weighing XRP against other options this cycle, our guide to the Best Crypto to Buy breaks down how it stacks up against other majors and altcoins — and if the August rally left you with gains to think about, our Cryptocurrency Taxation Basics guide covers what that means at tax time.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency and regulatory outcomes are uncertain — always do your own research before investing.